Fabric Protocol // Non-Blocking Verified

Architectural verification active. This track focuses on zero-copy data transfer and sub-microsecond interconnect logic.

AI // Briefing 03 Focus: Fabric Logic
Architectural Briefing // Distributed Fabrics

InfiniBand & RDMA Logic

In AI, the network is not just a pipe; it is the backplane. We deconstruct the logic of Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) and the physical InfiniBand topologies required to eliminate the “Communication Wall” in multi-node GPU clusters.


Physical Layer

Level 100: InfiniBand NDR & Physicals

  • 400G NDR: Implementing non-blocking 400Gb/s throughput per GPU for massive data exchange.
  • Optical Connectivity: Using specialized OSFP transceivers and active optical cables (AOC) to maintain signal integrity.

Architect’s Verdict: Standard Ethernet is for management; InfiniBand is for the compute fabric. Don’t mix the two if you want linear scaling.

Analyze Physicals
Transfer Logic

Level 200: Zero-Copy RDMA & RoCE

  • Zero-Copy Logic: Bypassing the CPU/OS stack to move data directly between GPU memories via the NIC.
  • RoCE v2: Implementing RDMA over Converged Ethernet for environments requiring Ethernet-based fabric consistency.

Architect’s Verdict: RDMA is the “Zero-Latency” requirement for AI. Without it, your expensive GPUs waste cycles waiting for the kernel to process packets.

Analyze RDMA Logic
Scaling

Level 300: Rail-Optimized Scaling

  • Rail-Optimization: Aligning NIC-to-GPU mapping to minimize cross-PCIe traffic and maximize throughput.
  • SHARP Integration: Offloading collective reduction operations to the switch hardware via NVIDIA Scalable Hierarchical Aggregation.

Architect’s Verdict: Linear scaling for LLMs with billions of parameters requires a non-blocking Fat-Tree fabric. Anything less is a compromise.

Advanced Fabric Lab

Validation Tool: Collective Communication Audit

Fabric Analytics Active

Scaling AI requires more than raw GPU power; it requires a non-blocking fabric. Use this tool to model Collective Communication overhead across InfiniBand and RoCE v2 topologies to identify scaling bottlenecks in multi-node clusters.

Analyze Fabric Latency → Requirement: NCCL / MPI Topology Access
Fabric Analysis // 01

Fabric Technical Comparison: InfiniBand vs. RoCE v2

While InfiniBand remains the gold standard for massive training, RoCE v2 offers an Ethernet-based path for specialized inference environments.

MetricThroughputLatencyCongestion ControlOperational Complexity
InfiniBand (NDR)400Gb/s per portSub-microsecondHardware-native; Credit-basedHigh; Separate fabric management
RoCE v2 (Ethernet)Up to 400Gb/s (Shared)1-5 microsecondsSoftware-defined; Priority-based (PFC)Moderate; Leverages Ethernet skills
In-Network Computing

Level 300: NVIDIA SHARP Technology

  • Hardware Aggregation: Moving collective operations like All-Reduce and Barrier from the GPU kernels to the InfiniBand switch hardware.
  • Reduction in Data Movement: By performing mathematical reductions inside the switch, the fabric transmits only the result, effectively doubling the usable bandwidth.
  • CPU/GPU Offloading: Freeing up trillions of GPU clock cycles that would otherwise be spent managing network synchronization.

Architect’s Verdict: In the world of high-parameter LLM training, SHARP is the difference between linear cluster scaling and massive performance degradation due to network congestion.

Distributed Fabric Lab