| | |

Client’s GKE Cluster Ate Their Entire VPC: The Class E Rescue (Part 2)

Editorial Integrity Verified

This technical deep-dive has passed the Rack2Cloud 3-Stage Vetting Process: Lab-Validated, Peer-Challenged, and Document-Anchored. No vendor marketing influence. See our Editorial Guidelines.

LAST VALIDATED: Jan 2026 TARGET STACK: GKE Standard / VPC-Native STATUS: Production Verified

The “Impossible” Fix: Class E Migration

In Part 1, we diagnosed the crime scene: A production GKE cluster flatlined because its /20 subnet (4,096 IPs) hit a hard ceiling at exactly 16 nodes.

The “Official” consultant solution? Rebuild the VPC with a /16. The “Actual” engineering solution? Class E Address Space.

If you are reading this, you likely don’t have the luxury of a maintenance window to tear down your entire networking stack. You need IPs, and you need them now. This is the field guide to the rescue operation.

The Math: Why Your Subnet Disappeared

Before we fix it, let’s explain exactly why a /20 vanishes so fast. It comes down to GKE’s default formula for VPC-native clusters, which prioritizes anti-fragmentation over efficiency.

The Formula:

(Max Pods per Node × 2) rounded up to the nearest subnet mask

By default, GKE assumes 110 pods per node.

  • The math: 110 × 2 = 220 IPs.
  • The round-up: The nearest CIDR block to hold 220 IPs is a /24 (256 IPs).

So, the math for your /20 subnet becomes brutal:

  • Total IPs: 4,096 (/20)
  • Cost Per Node: 256 (/24)
  • Result: 4096 / 256 = 16 Nodes.

It doesn’t matter if you run 1 pod or 100—that /24 slice is locked exclusively to that node the moment it boots.

The Fix: Why Class E? (And Why Not CGNAT?)

To rescue the cluster without a rebuild, we need to attach a massive amount of contiguous IP space to the existing subnet. We chose Class E (240.0.0.0/4).

Comparison of RFC1918 private IP space versus Class E 240.0.0.0/4 address space
  • Why not CGNAT (100.64.0.0/10)? In complex enterprise environments, CGNAT ranges often conflict with carrier-grade peering or existing transit setups. We needed zero routing conflicts.
  • Why not IPv6? IPv6 is the correct strategic answer. But flipping a legacy IPv4-only environment to dual-stack during an active outage is a high-risk gamble.
  • The Class E Advantage: It offers ~268 million IPs. Most modern operating systems (Linux kernels 3.x+) and GCP’s software-defined network handle it natively.

Step 1: Verify Prerequisites

Stop. This is a rescue operation, not a standard architecture. Verify these constraints before running commands:

  1. GKE Standard Only: GKE Autopilot manages this automatically; this guide is for Standard clusters.
  2. VPC-Native: Your cluster must use Alias IPs.
  3. Hardware Warning: While GCP’s SDN handles Class E perfectly, physical on-prem firewalls (Palo Alto, Cisco, etc.) often drop these packets. If your pods need to talk to on-prem databases via VPN/Interconnect, verify your hardware firewall rules first.
  4. Pod Ranges Only: This fix solves Pod IP exhaustion. If you have exhausted your Service (ClusterIP) range, this guide will not help you (Service ranges are immutable).

Step 2: The Expansion (No Downtime)

We will attach a secondary CIDR range to your existing subnet. We’ll use a /20 (4,096 IPs) from Class E to match the original scope without massive over-provisioning.

The Command:

Bash

gcloud compute networks subnets update [SUBNET_NAME] \
    --region [REGION] \
    --add-secondary-ranges pods-rescue-range=240.0.0.0/20

Step 3: Create the Rescue Node Pool

Existing pools cannot dynamically change their Pod CIDR. We must create a new pool targeting our pods-rescue-range.

  • Critical: You must use the COS_CONTAINERD image type. Older Docker-based images or legacy OS versions may not handle Class E routing correctly.

The Command:

Bash

gcloud container node-pools create rescue-pool-v1 \
    --cluster [CLUSTER_NAME] \
    --region [REGION] \
    --machine-type e2-standard-4 \
    --image-type=COS_CONTAINERD \
    --enable-autoscaling --min-nodes 2 --max-nodes 20 \
    --cluster-secondary-range-name pods-rescue-range \
    --node-locations [ZONE_A],[ZONE_B]

Step 4: The Migration (Cordon & Drain)

Once the rescue nodes are online (verify they are pulling 240.x.x.x IPs), shift workloads from the starved pool.

1. Cordon the old nodes:

Bash

kubectl get nodes -l cloud.google.com/gke-nodepool=default-pool -o name | xargs kubectl cordon

2. Drain workloads (safely):

Bash

kubectl drain [NODE_NAME] --ignore-daemonsets --delete-emptydir-data --timeout=10m0s

Step 5: Validation

Confirm the control plane sees the new ranges:

Bash

gcloud container clusters describe [CLUSTER] --format="value(clusterIpv4Cidr,podIpv4Cidr)"

Then, verify the pods are actually pulling from the new block:

Bash

kubectl get pods --all-namespaces -o wide | grep 240.0.
Validation of Kubernetes pods running with Class E IP addresses.

If you see 240.x.x.x addresses, congratulations. You have successfully engineered your way out of a corner.

The Architect’s Verdict

Risk Analysis: AMBER

Using Class E space is a valid, production-ready technique in 2026, but it is Technical Debt. It breaks the mental model of RFC1918 private networking.

  • Documentation: You MUST document this. If a junior engineer sees 240.x.x.x IPs next year, they might assume the cluster is misconfigured or hacked.
  • Future-Proofing: This buys you time. Use that time to plan a proper VPC sizing strategy or evaluate if your workload actually requires the complexity of Kubernetes.
  • Greenfield vs. Rescue: In a greenfield environment, you would plan your subnets perfectly. But we don’t always work in greenfield environments. Sometimes, the job is just to keep the lights on.

Additional Resources:

R.M. - Senior Technical Solutions Architect
About The Architect

R.M.

Senior Solutions Architect with 25+ years of experience in HCI, cloud strategy, and data resilience. As the lead behind Rack2Cloud, I focus on lab-verified guidance for complex enterprise transitions. View Credentials →

Affiliate Disclosure

This architectural deep-dive contains affiliate links to hardware and software tools validated in our lab. If you make a purchase through these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. This support allows us to maintain our independent testing environment and continue producing ad-free strategic research. See our Full Policy.

Similar Posts